Living Cruelty Free

My name is Emily, and I’m a cruelty-freeist — I’m really opposed to causing needless animal suffering. This blog chronicles my spending a year (and counting!) of buying toiletries made by companies whose final products AND initial ingredients were never, ever tested on animals. Other than that, I’m your regular run of the mill vegetarian trying to go vegan (but I am a strong supporter of humane omnivorism since I used to be a carnivore — I don’t think you’re scum if you eat meat, I just hope you’ll consider switching to not supporting horrific factory farming conditions). I live in the San Francisco bay area, I have a dog I cook food for, and I hope I can help you if you’re thinking of adding more cruelty-freeism to your life!

Saturday, May 31, 2008

May 2008 Digest

This month I blogged about:

Veterinarians Who Aren’t Merchants of Death: The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights

If You Wouldn’t Wear Your Dog, Please Don’t Wear Fur: Jared Padalecki’s Ad for PETA

Grateful Body Normal Skin Sampler Set (4/5 stars)

Another Small Victory in the Fight to Remove Animals from Toxicological Testing: In Vitro Test Beats Animal Tests for Measuring Skin Irritancy

Video Update

Let’s Welcome 14 New Companies to Being 100%-animal-testing-free!

A Request

The Body Shop Facial Muslin Cloths (4/5 stars)

I thought I’d start a new monthly wrap-up feature — things I wish I could find from cruelty-free companies. So far, I’ve got:

1) Unscented, aluminum-containing deodorant.

2) Instant stain remover wipes.

3) Teeth whitening strips.

4) Eye drops.
I really wish I could buy all of these. I’m hoping these are out there and I just don’t know about them yet. It’s possible!  I haven’t worked my way through all the new cruelty-free companies on the CCIC’s list, or all the European cruelty-free companies, and one of them COULD make unscented aluminum-containing deodorant, instant stain remover wipes, teeth whitening strips, and/or eyedrops. I’ve got my fingers crossed, anyway! I should mention here that the last time I wrote a post about things I wish I could find in cruelty-free form, one of my wishes was answered — namely, I found John Paul Pet dog tooth and gum wipes! So I can only hope these other products will be made available soon as well . . .

posted by Emily at 4:25 pm  

Thursday, May 29, 2008

The Body Shop Facial Muslin Cloths (4/5 stars)

body-shop-facial-muslin-cloths.jpgI first read about these face cloths on MakeupAlley, and initially I was skeptical, but they received many rave reviews, and I have been looking for an exfoliating washcloth for a while, so I thought I’d try them out. (I couldn’t find any other cruelty-free gentle exfoliating washcloths — you would think more companies would make these, but no. They only appear to make painfully harsh exfoliating loofahs or chemical exfoliants instead.) My skin always tends to become more bumpy in the summer — especially on my forehead and forearms — and normal washcloths don’t really help with that.

According to the Body Shop website, these cloths are useful to mildly exfoliate and deep cleanse the skin, while boosting circulation. Use them daily for regular and effective deep cleansing and circulation boosting.

I bought these washcloths a few weeks ago at my local Body Shop in the face cleaning area (not the loofah/scrub brush area).  You get 3 for $9, which is kind of expensive, but I figure they’ll last a long time, so they’re a good value.  They are very thin muslin cloths about the size of a normal washcloth. You could probably make these yourself by buying a yard of muslin and cutting it out into 10″ squares and hemming the edges, but I’m not very talented with a sewing machine, so I’m much happier to just buy them pre-sewn.  I know they won’t unravel at the edges if I don’t sew them!

I’ve been using one of these cloths daily for a few weeks, and I just love it! It gently polishes away any bumps I get on my forehead and forearms, and my skin has never looked so clear or felt so smooth.  And I don’t have to use any strong chemical exfoliants that dry out my skin and then cause breakouts! It’s also really useful on my elbows and knees — I can polish off any roughness and it leaves my elbows and knees silky smooth. I’m really looking forward to traveling with one of these as well — they are very lightweight and dry almost immediately in the shower, unlike normal washcloths. The only problem I have with these face cloths is that they are made by the Body Shop, which is owned by L’Oreal, and I HATE buying anything from L’Oreal since it is evil and seriously tests on animals — so I’m taking a star off for that. However, I figure that by buying Body Shop products I am actually encouraging L’Oreal to stop testing on animals — I am, in effect, giving L’Oreal money to refrain from testing on animals — and I think that’s a very good thing for me to do. I’m rewarding L’Oreal for its good behavior! So yes, I have mixed emotions about buying stuff from the Body Shop. (The Body Shop is certified by the Coalition for Consumer Information in Cosmetics, so you can be sure anything you buy from there is 100%-animal-testing-free.)

A pack of three Body Shop Facial Muslin Cloths is available for $9.00 at your local Body Shop.

posted by Emily at 10:08 pm  

Saturday, May 24, 2008

A Request for Cruelty-Free Products Around the World

I’ve been receiving a lot of email lately from people saying how they’re sure that all the products I write about are wonderful, but they can’t obtain any of them where they live. And I’m kind of at a loss to help them — I really don’t know what cruelty-free products are easy to find in every health food store across the U.S., let alone outside of it. So I was wondering if any of you savvy cruelty-freeists could help me out? If you regularly buy products that are CCIC-approved, GoCrueltyFree-approved, ChooseCrueltyFree.org.au-approved, ECEAE-approved, One Voice-approved, Vier Pfoten-approved, Animalia-approved or on any of my lists, could you please, please, please comment here about them? Just write in your (chosen) name, the state/country you live in, and a list of CCIC-approved products you normally buy in stores near you, and, if possible, the name of those stores. (As long as the companies subscribe to the Humane Cosmetics Standard, I’m fine with promoting them. If the companies do not subscribe to the Humane Cosmetics Standard, I am NOT fine with them, and I will delete your comment. Please make sure they are on one of those lists.)

For example, say you live across the globe from me (or just a few thousand miles away from me in a different state) and can’t find Method products anywhere (is this possible? Has Target not taken over the world?) — but you can always find Seventh Generation products at health food stores in your neighborhood, mention it here! (If you know of any CCIC-approved products that are sold at local chain stores, that would be a huge, huge bonus! Please mention that those stores are chain stores.)

I have had numerous requests from Canada — so if there are any Canadian CCIC-approved cruelty-free brands you could recommend, those would be especially appreciated. (If you don’t live in Canada, but would like to know what cruelty-free options are available to you, please feel free to leave a comment giving your locale and requesting help from other kind cruelty-freeists . . . )

Eventually I’m hoping to make up a sort of map with information on where to buy cruelty-free products anywhere in the world. Wouldn’t that be cool? Though sadly, I fear that is far beyond my website-designing skills . . .

posted by Emily at 10:29 pm  

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Let’s Welcome 14 New Companies to Being 100%-animal-testing-free!

I just updated my list of cruelty-free companies, and this time I carefully went through and figured out who all the new companies are (unlike last time, when I updated my list and then realized it had grown immensely, but had no idea who most of the new companies were), and so I can confidently state that I am adding 14 new companies to my list of cruelty-free companies. Yay! (I get my list from the CCIC’s list of cruelty-free companies — companies on that list pledge to not use animal testing, and their suppliers pledge as well, so consumers who buy CCIC-approved products are assured they are 100%-animal-testing-free).

I’d like to welcome all these companies to their new status of being 100%-animal-testing-free!

Bamboo Aesthetics

belle & bianca

Burt’s Bees

Coastal Classic Creations

Face Facts by Lori

Florere, Inc.

Joyful Hands Holistic Pet Care

KSA Jojoba

Neal’s Yard Remedies

Nectar Essences

Rare Natural Care, Inc. (Hi Jasmin!)

Simplers Botanicals

Tsi~La

Velvet & Sweet Pea’s Purrfumery

Cruelty-free subsidiary of parent company that does not comply with the Leaping Bunny Standard.
Company is a licensee of the CCIC Logo.

posted by Emily at 8:57 pm  

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Video Update

It’s been brought to my attention that the video I wrote about in this post wasn’t working very well. If you’d still like to see it and you had trouble viewing it, please click here to go to its google video page.

posted by Emily at 11:53 pm  

Monday, May 12, 2008

Another Small Victory in the Fight to Remove Animals from Toxicological Testing: In Vitro Test Beats Animal Tests for Measuring Skin Irritancy

After I found that video I posted about a few days ago (have any of you watched it? I swear it’s hilarious) I signed up for the Physician Committee for Responsible Medicine’s breaking news alerts, and I received this one, which I thought was interesting. It’s just another small (but important!) example of an in vitro test being more accurate in measuring skin irritancy than a test involving hurting a live animal. (And it involves MatTek Corporation, one of the in vitro companies I’ve written about before!)

Cell Culture Beats Animal Tests for Irritancy Accuracy

A test method derived from cultured human skin cells is more accurate than animal tests at identifying skin irritants, according to a new report from MatTek, Inc., a Massachusetts company that develops alternatives to animal tests. While tests in rabbits misclassified 10 out of the 25 test chemicals, the company’s EpiDerm™ method detected all irritating chemicals correctly.

Another study found that EpiDerm™ and another MatTek cell model, EpiAirway™, contain the enzymes necessary to metabolize toxic chemicals in the same way that these tissues would in an intact human. EpiAirway™ is a model constructed from cells that line the human airway passages, and can be used to test chemicals for potential toxicity to the respiratory system.

The reports were presented at the annual Society of Toxicology meeting in Seattle, held March 16-20, 2008 (http://www.mattek.com/pages/news/wn049).

For information about nutrition and health, please visit www.pcrm.org/.

Breaking Medical News is a service of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 5100 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20016.

If you’re interested in signing up for PCRM’s news alerts, click here. (You can also sign up for their newsletter, information about campaigns, and vegan recipes there as well, if you’re interested in that sort of thing.)

posted by Emily at 3:19 pm  

Friday, May 9, 2008

Grateful Body Normal Skin Sampler Set (4/5 stars)

grateful-body.jpg

Grateful Body is a relatively new addition to the CCIC’s list of cruelty-free companies — it’s one of the many new additions to the list this year. It’s an interesting company — it’s vegan-except-for-bee-products (bee-vegan? is there a term for this?), and uses three types of ingredients — either USDA certified organic ingredients, certified biodynamic ingredients — biodynamic means all its ingredients come from farms that use only organic fertilizers and pesticides which are usually fermented herbal and mineral preparations as compost additives or field sprays — or ethically wildcrafted ingredients. It’s an accredited and registered “green business,” it meets USDA organic food guidelines, uses green packaging, is an active supporter of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, has pledged the Natural Ingredients Resource Center Truth in Labeling pledge, and has been reviewed by the Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep consumer database and ranked as one of the safest skin care companies in the U.S.

Grateful Body Mission Statement: At Grateful Body we create truly safe, effective products with tangible vitality. We aspire to operate ethically and sustainably in all aspects of our business — creating products that express our gratitude for all life and building a company that truly serves both people and planet.

Story:
GratefulBody is a family-owned and -operated company in Berkeley, California. We’ve been making pure botanical skin care products since 1998, because at that time it was even more difficult to buy safe and effective skin care products. We established our own high ingredient standards at the very beginning and have enjoyed maintaining them ever since (there’s still virtually no consumer-safety regulation of the body care industry). The only thing that made sense to us was to limit our ingredients to those that are 100% biologically appropriate, so we never had to wean ourselves from using the convenient synthetics that are so common.

We believe Mother Nature herself would heartily approve of our skin care “recipes” - and we will always believe that skin care should be nourishing to the body as a whole as well as useful in improving one’s complexion. There’s no separation between our skin, our health, and our environment, and we make sure that GratefulBody products benefit all three of those essential aspects of our lives. We hope our vital formulations will make a beautiful impression on you. For us, it’s a joy to make truly healthful skin care, and we wish you joy in using our products.

I ordered a sample set of Grateful Body cleanser, toner, and moisturizer for “normal” skin a few weeks ago, because I’d never seen Grateful Body products before, and I was excited to see they are organic and on the CCIC’s list. Plus I LOVE sample size sets, and the price was great. The sample set comes with three .5 oz bottles of Daily Facial Cleanser, Daily Facial Toner, and Daily Facial Therapy for Normal Skin.

My first reaction on seeing the sample set was that the bottles are REALLY cute — they are old-fashioned brown glass medicinal bottles. I don’t know if the full size products also come in glass bottles, but I hope they do. My second reaction upon reading the list of ingredients was that people with sensitive skin should definitely NOT buy the normal skin line. It is absolutely full of extracts and essential oils of various herbs and plants. Grateful Body does make a sensitive skin line — I suspect that would be much better if you like hypoallergenic stuff.

Daily Facial Cleanser: Nourish and moisturize while cleansing your skin! Made of whole, beneficial botanicals instead of synthetics, there’s nothing harsh about this cleanser. Removes dirt, oil, and most make-up, without stripping vital skin elements. This gentle, non-drying cleanser is suitable for all skin types, dry to oily.

Usage: Moisten the skin, and use a small amount. Massage into face and neck for as long as you like. Rinse with water, pat dry. Follow with Daily Facial Toner.

Ingredients: Distilled water, organic aloe vera gel, organic oils of high oleic safflower and sesame, wildcrafted seaweed extract, vegetable emulsifying wax, organic witch hazel, organic herbal infusions of burdock root, hops flowers, echinacea root, dandelion root & leaf and plantain, vegetable glycerin, organic or wildcrafted essential oils of rosemary, grapefruit, lavender, lemon verbena, carrot seed, ylang ylang, organic bulgarian rose water, xanthan gum, organic sage and rosemary antioxidants, vitamins A, C, & E, grapefruit seed extract.

The daily facial cleanser is a nice gentle cleanser. It doesn’t lather, which is strange but understandable since it uses no chemical lathering agents, and it smells VERY herbal — but in a nice way — I don’t dislike it, and I’m not the biggest fan of herbal smelling products. It has a nice consistency — neither too runny nor too thick, and a little goes a long way, which is nice. It’s kind of thick but not oily the way Juice Organics cleanser is. It felt a little odd to me after using the oil-based Juice Organics cleanser for so long — I really missed the way I can wash my eyelids with the Juice Organics cleanser because the oil doesn’t sting my eyes at all. However, the Grateful Body cleanser didn’t make my skin too dry, and it seemed to remove dirt, so I am happy with it.

Daily Facial Toner: A truly beneficial toner that helps your skin find its own balance point. Gently astringent (shrinks pores), this hydrating toner will not dry your skin. Prepares skin for moisturizing, but is nourishing in its own right. The experience is refreshing and gently vitalizing. Regular use encourages a firm and smooth complexion.
Apply after using Daily Facial Cleanser. Mist your face directly, or spray into palm and pat or smooth on face with fingertips. Allow to dry on skin. Follow with Daily Facial Therapy or 30Plus Nourishment of your choice.

Ingredients: Organic herbal infusions (in organic apple cider vinegar) of green tea, horsetail, calendula, elder flower, comfrey root, lavender, chamomile, american ginseng, slippery elm, licorice, echinacea, gota kola, rose hips & comfrey leaf, organic aloe vera gel, organic witch hazel, organic lavender & geranium hydrosols, vitamins A, C, & E organic or wild-crafted essential oils of grapefruit, lavender, fennel and lemongrass.

The daily facial toner is a nice toner. It feels a little alcoholy, but it does remove any last trace of the cleanser residue before I moisturize, which is nice. The oddest thing about it is it smells very medicinal, and it reminds me of horse treats. But I can’t quite put my finger on what makes it smell like horse treats. Is it the horsetail, calendula, elder flower, comfrey root, american ginseng, slippery elm, echniacea, gota kola, comfrey, witch hazel, or fennel that make it smell that way? I like the smell, anyway. I’ve always thought horse treats have a nice scent.

Daily Facial Therapy/Normal Skin: A true moisturizing lotion that deeply feeds the skin with 100% natural, super-hydrating whole plants and oils. Helps skin become naturally soft, smooth, and healthy instead coating it with a false, synthetically “silky” finish. Full of antioxidant phytonutrients that nourish and protect.

Ingredients: Distilled water, organic high oleic safflower oil, organic herbal infusions of marshmallow root, chickweed, comfrey root, rose hips, slippery elm, lavender flowers, chamomile flowers & cleavers, vegetable emulsifying wax, wildcrafted seaweed extract, vegetable glycerin, organic aloe vera gel, organic Bulgarian rose water, soy lecithin, organic sage and rosemary antioxidants, xanthan gum, organic or wildcrafted essential oils of lavender, rosemary, immortelle, geranium, grapefruit & Bulgarian rose, vitamins A, C, & E, grapefruit seed extract.

The Daily Facial Therapy for Normal Skin (moisturizer) is my favorite of the three products. It’s light, it’s moisturizing, it’s not greasy, it has a great consistency, and a little goes a long way. Compared to the Juice Organics moisturizer, I find it more moisturizing, which I like. However, it has one big problem — and that’s the reason I’m taking a star off — it does not protect against skin cancer. The Grateful Body FAQ (which I’m attaching to the end of this post) actually has an explanation for why not — basically the Grateful Body people feel that most sunscreens are not “safe and natural.” I disagree with this partially — I don’t think titanium dioxide or zinc oxide have been shown to be unsafe (as far as I know), and I believe that by protecting your skin from possibly fatal melanomas they’re far safer than wearing no sunscreen at all. However, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide can’t be biodynamically farmed, so I can see why they would be wrong for Grateful Body. The Gratefuly Body FAQ does recommend wearing hats and sun protective clothing and keeping your sun exposure down, which is of course excellent advice. In either case, I would recommend using Earth’s Beauty SPF face powder over this moisturizer if you choose to use it (or any other face powder with titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, avobenzone, mexoryl or octocrylene in it).

Overall, I think the Grateful Body Normal Skin line is excellent, except for its lack of sunscreen. I find the biodynamic nature of their ingredients really admirable. However, I did break out a little bit after using the line for a few weeks. I think I may need to add an exfoliator to this routine if I use it for any length of time. I’m still pretty indecisive about whether I prefer the Juice Organics line to this one. I think this one may appeal to me more in the summer because the Juice Organics line is too heavy for hot weather.

Grateful Body Normal Skin Sampler Set is available for $10.50 from WildOrganics.net.

posted by Emily at 11:40 pm  

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

If You Wouldn’t Wear Your Dog, Please Don’t Wear Fur: Jared Padalecki’s Ad for PETA

180-jaredpadalecki_ad1.jpg

This isn’t really an animal testing issue, but I was thrilled to find this PETA anti-fur poster with Jared Padalecki, one of the stars of Supernatural , on it. (Thanks Natasha for telling me about this! I love it!). I think PETA should run full-page ads of this in major newspapers. Aren’t Jared Padalecki’s dogs adorable? I love that one on the left — is it some kind of hound?

If you click on this link it will take you to a page where you can vote whether you would wear your dog or not, and sign a petition against (horrible) fur farms.

posted by Emily at 10:53 pm  

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Veterinarians Who Aren’t Merchants of Death: The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights

avar21.jpg

For some reason my post on veterinary students dissecting live dogs is one of the most popular posts I’ve ever written. I’m not entirely sure why — the horrific truth is that veterinary medicine is based on animal sacrifice. All the drugs and surgeries your veterinarian gives your pet when you go in to an animal hospital were first tested out on numerous healthy laboratory rats and rabbits (and dogs and cats) who suffered and died for them. Heck, human medicine is based on animal sacrifice as well — eventually all those wonder drugs and surgeries prove effective on dogs and cats in laboratories or on the operating table, and they’re eventually allowed to be practiced upon us. You and your pets have better health today because of the routine torture of numerous laboratory animals. Do you take antidepressants, blood pressure medications, painkillers, etc.? Have you had any complex surgeries? Do you think they tested those out on people first? No — they tested them out on perfectly healthy animals first. Approximately 12.1 million healthy animals were tortured and killed in Europe alone in the last year for medical and/or toxicological purposes. (My pet peeve here is that there is NO REASON to continue torturing and killing so many animals — many brilliant scientists have come up with numerous sophisticated alternatives to animal testing that have already obviated the need to kill any animals to test many types of toxicity, and if we can convince people to donate more money to find more alternative methods, and convince people to buy products that have been created using these alternative methods, eventually I believe we’ll find even more alternatives to animal testing and that number of 12.1 million animals a year will drop down to 6 million and, it is to be hoped, eventually 0.)

So I figure I should mention that there is, in fact, an organization that works to promote ending vivisection AND promoting veterinary medicine. It’s the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights (AVAR). The 3,500 veterinarians who are members of it both promote veterinary medicine AND alternatives to animal testing.

AVAR’s Mission Statement

The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights actively works toward the acquisition of rights for all nonhuman animals by educating the public and the veterinary profession about a variety of issues concerning nonhuman animal use. The AVAR is actively seeking reformation of the way society treats all nonhumans and an increase in environmental awareness, as well.

AVAR operates under the premise that all nonhuman animals have value and interests independent of the values and interests of other animals, including humans. As physicians protect the interests and needs of their patients, so should veterinarians.

The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights was founded in 1981 by Neil C. Wolff, D.V.M., and Nedim C. Buyukmihci, V.M.D. They were both concerned that the animals they were caring for and treating at their veterinary school were being abused by the veterinary school (no kidding! A lot of experimental surgeries are done at veterinary schools). They also realized that the veterinary profession, “under the banner of ‘adequate veterinary care,’ often supported practices which were completely contrary to the well-being of the animals.” Thus, they formed AVAR to make the public and the veterinary profession more humane.

The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights focuses on reducing the “harmful and fatal use of animals in veterinary training; outreach to veterinarians, veterinary technicians and veterinary students; advocacy for companion animals and farm animals; and public education on other animal protection and veterinary issues.” It publishes two newsletters — one on “alternatives to harmful or fatal animal use in veterinary education, which is distributed three times annually to veterinary medical students in North America veterinary schools, and the other is a general newsletter sent out to veterinarians, veterinary students, and supporters.”

The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights’ has a very useful contribution to the veterinary world in its database of alternative-to-using-live-animals-for-dissection database. It accumulates all the known alternatives to using live animals in veterinary education — there are thousands listed. (I think it’s wonderful that these alternatives are publicized — all the veterinarians who contributed these procedures/methods are saving countless dogs, cats, and other animals from being mutilated and killed, and promoting training veterinary students to become skilled at performing important veterinary surgeries/procedures.)

AVAR also has some interesting sections on its website — there’s a section that compares the inhumanity of various veterinary schools — so if you’re thinking of going into veterinary medicine but don’t want to mutilate and kill live animals, this should be a great resource for you. (Please say there are some of you out there!) There is also a section on how AVAR is a strong advocate for humane farming methods such as providing a more natural environment for animals, and allowing them to enjoy their short lives before they are killed. Not surprisingly, AVAR is also a supporter of the petition to ban confining calves, pigs, and hens to ludicrously tiny crates in California.

Interestingly enough, AVAR describes itself as different from other veterinary organizations in that it maintains that while there are benefits from using animals in research, testing, and education, the ends do not justify the means, and since adequate alternatives exist for many research, testing, and educational uses of nonhuman animals, we should focus on using some of those instead. This is in direct contrast to the largest association of veterinarians, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), which has been quoted as saying that it “cannot endorse the philosophical views and personal values of animal rights advocates when they are incompatible with the responsible use of animals for human purposes.” (By “responsible” the American Veterinary Medical Association means horrifically abusing thousands of animals. I find that a little hard to swallow. I mean — let’s tell the truth here — animal experimentation can never be called responsible — it’s horrific, abusive, inhumane and appalling. If you want to say animal experimentation is awful but it’s been incredibly beneficial to advancing society’s knowledge of medicine, say so.) The American Veterinary Medical Association may be an organization devoted to improving animal health — but it’s clearly on the side of torturing animals to promote human health without really making any effort to find less painful methods of doing so. Which I feel is irresponsible for an institution dedicated to animals.

Fascinatingly enough, it turns out that AVAR and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) are joining forces to launch a competitor to the American Veterinary Medical Association, since the American Veterinary Medical Association so steadfastly refuses to acknowledge the extreme animal suffering that occurs in the wake of scientific progress and making battery farmers wealthy. It will be called the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association (HSVMA). (Isn’t that amazing? I love this!) This joining with the HSUS will give AVAR access to more resources and more policy/advocacy clout. AVAR hopes that this will organize many more thousands of veterinarians to use alternatives to vivisection. (Veterinarians, veterinary technicians, students, and other professionals associated with the veterinary field are encouraged to visit www.humanesociety.org/vets to sign up to receive announcements about HSVMA.)

It’s really interesting for me to note that of the 80,000 veterinarians in the US, 11,000 of them are already supporters of the HSUS. To me, this suggests that those 11,000 are different from your usual veterinarian in the sense that they don’t like abusing and sacrificing live animals for educational purposes or to create more wonder drugs and surgeries. I’d love to meet these people! Seriously. I’ve always been interested in science yet opposed to animal torture, so I feel like these people are bridging the gap between the two. I hope they will become the future of veterinary medicine . . .

posted by Emily at 9:37 pm  

Powered by WordPress