So I’ve been reading up on paint that’s been tested on animals (thanks to Michael for bringing this to my attention!). Apparently, a lot of house paints have been tested on animals. I had absolutely no idea. For example, here’s the safety data for Behr white paint #1050 — it lists all the animal tests that were done on this paint alone. They are REALLY appalling.
Unfortunately, the Coalition for Consumer Information in Cosmetics, my usual go-to source for 100%-animal-testing-free cosmetics/household products, does not certify paint products. It just certifies cosmetics/household products. So, this makes finding 100%-animal-testing-free paints a little tricky. Basically it means that there are no paint companies that make their suppliers pledge to give them animal-testing-free ingredients. Even if I find a paint company that swears it never commissions tests on animals, this doesn’t mean its products are 100%-animal-testing-free. It means the finished products have not been tested on animals, but the initial ingredients that went into those paints may well have been sourced from companies that do test on animals. So this makes those paints about . . . 50%-animal-testing-free by my reckoning. But I’ll just have to live with that. 50%-animal-testing-free is a heck of a lot better than Behr-100%-cruelly-tested-on-animals paint.
So, here are the bunch of brands of paints that are 50%-animal-testing-free!:
Devine Color Paint (USA) (vegan)
Anna Sova paints (USA) (not vegan)
Ecos paints (UK) (vegan)
Ecopaints (mostly vegan paints) (UK)
Earthborn paints (mostly vegan paints) (UK)
BioPaints — some vegan paints, some not (NZ)
Amma Earth Paints (Australia)
AFM Safecoat (USA)
(If you know of any other paint companies that don’t test on animals, please drop me a line and I’ll add them to this list. If you’ve tried any of these paints, could you please write a fully detailed review of that paint in a comment to this post? You know — how was dealing with the company, was the color selection good, did the paints appear to be high-quality, what did the paints look, smell, and feel like, were they overly expensive or a good value, did they last a long time or peel off the walls immediately, and, out of a possible five stars, how many stars would you give them? That sort of thing. I don’t intend to paint anything for at least another five years (or ever again, if I can help it), so I’m not going to write a product review of any of these in the near future, so I’d appreciate any information on these paints!)
Hi Emily,
I too didn’t know about this, I will investigate!!!!
But..as I told you about toys…nothing surprise me, not any more!
Thank you, once again!
P.S. Check your mail later on!
Regards, Raffaella
Comment by Raffaella — April 14, 2008 @ 5:49 am
Gasp! Thanks for bringing this to light! How about the brand afm safecoat (afmsafecoat.com)? They try to eliminate any toxic ingredients from their paints and claim no animal testing. I looked at a couple MSDS, and the toxicity portion lists no toxic ingredients…??
Comment by Tammy — April 22, 2008 @ 5:52 pm
Dear Tammy,
I’m so glad you enjoyed my post. I shall have to check out afm safecoat — it sounds like an excellent addition to the list!
Regards,
Emily
Comment by Emily — April 22, 2008 @ 10:51 pm
While it is true that all of the chemicals listed in the MSDS are tested on animals, it is not fair to say that the paint itself is tested on animals.
The information contained on the Behr MSDS sheets reflects tests that were performed on the individual chemicals contained in the paint, not the paint itself, and not necessesarily at the request of Behr either.
ALL chemicals, including innocuos things like vitamins and “non toxic” chemicals are tested, or have been tested, on animals, at some point in time.
(Do a search for “Vitamin A MSDS”)
I am not defending anyone nor is this an endorsment of Behr paint.
I just wanted to shed some light on this and encourage people to dig a little deeper and understand the information presented to them before jumping to any rash conclusions.
(Yes, I am a Vegan)
Stinky
Comment by Stinky — August 29, 2008 @ 2:56 am
Dear Stinky,
Thanks for writing in — not that I don’t disbelieve your points, but do you have any sources that support them? I don’t really know much about MSDS reports, so I’d love to learn more.
Also — I’m a little confused by your proposition that tests were performed on individual chemicals, not the paint itself, and that makes them okay. I don’t think that is true. Most animal testing isn’t actually performed on finished products — this is why “finished product not tested on animals” is such a lie by implication. Most companies just test initial ingredients on animals. Also, whether or not Behr ran the tests themselves is not an issue — if they commissioned the tests from a different laboratory, or just decided not to make sure their paint ingredients weren’t tested on animals, I hold Behr responsible for the animal testing of their products. I think of them as just outsourcing animal testing.
Also, whether or not vitamin A has an MSDS report is not an issue for me — it’s the company that produces a product that I want to know did or did not do animal testing. Most chemicals at one time were tested on animals. Every shampoo ingredient invented in the past fifty years. I don’t not use current shampoos that aren’t tested on animals because their ingredients were in the far distant past once tested on animals. I’d have to give up all of my toiletries. If Behr came out and said, look, this MSDS on our paint ingredients was done totally not at our behest, I’d be okay with them. I’m just not entirely convinced by your argument that Behr wasn’t involved in torturing rats for their paint in the first place. But if you have further arguments and sources to support your point, I’d love to change my mind!
Regards,
Comment by Emily — September 12, 2008 @ 6:28 pm